iPad 3 Battery Life Expectations is going to be even more powerful than the IPAD 2 with an awesome new iPhone Retina 4-style screen. Does this have an effect on battery life of renowned iPad? How long can we expect the last iPad 3 a single charge?
Thin: Apple iPad two made a series of improvements to the original format of IPAD, with a more powerful processor and slimmer form factor. Accomplished all this while maintaining the original device impressive battery life of 10 hours. You might have expected Apple to achieve parity as a more powerful drive up the size of the battery unit, but the surprising fact is the IPAD 2 batteries is 59 percent less than the equivalent IPAD.
IHS iSuppli conducted a teardown of the IPAD 2 to determine how Apple had become so thin. The main reason mentioned was the reduction in the size of the battery, the technology research makes a “major change” in the design of the battery. It explains that “Apple spent two to three thinner thicker cells, flattening of the overall structure of the battery.”
Besides this, Apple has patented a method for packing more active material in batteries, increasing durability without increasing the physical size. All this goes to show that Apple is investing so much attention in battery technology, as is the display or processor technology. Could we see the pattern continue in the IPAD 3 with a four-cell battery even more efficient?
Unique demands: As discussed previously, the common consensus among experts is that the IPAD 3 will be much better screen technology which will have a clearer and sharper screen. To put it bluntly, it will be a 9.7-inch screen Retina. This would suggest that any advantage gained by superior battery will lose pumping the extra pixels, but that’s not necessarily the case.
Display Technology DisplayMate site conducted a test that compares the iPhone 4 retinal display with low resolution screens of the Samsung S Galaxy Droid, the iPhone 3G and Google Nexus. It was found that 4 of the iPhone screen is the most energy efficient of the sample, “that supports Apple’s claims that the technology is easy on the battery.
The same can be said of Apple technology processor. There is a reasonable possibility of iPad 3 chipset (which they call the A6) will be quad-core, improve the skills of the bar significantly. This need not be a huge battery drain suggesting however. As mentioned before, on 2 dual-core A5 IPAD manages its energy much more efficiently than single-core A4 of the original IPAD, intelligent adjust its clock speed (and therefore energy use) in accordance with application.
How long will it last: Based on the suggestions above and the precedent set by previous devices from Apple, I guess the IPAD 3 of battery will see only modest gains as Apple seeks to create a tablet device more powerful and even thinner. Apple has always been the balance, and seems happy with the IPAD and October 2 hours of battery life – to be happy if you can keep that number in the face of significant improvements elsewhere.
According to CultofMac the iPad 3 will be the true technological leap forward for Apple’s tablet range. Perhaps the most impressive feat is that all this functionality does not come at the expense of battery life. Anyway, would not surprise me if the technology is increasingly efficient for Apple squeezed an extra hour of battery life out of IPAD 3. Put us down for 11.
iPad 3 Battery Life Expectations
IHS iSuppli conducted a teardown of the IPAD 2 to determine how Apple had become so thin. The main reason mentioned was the reduction in the size of the battery, the technology research makes a “major change” in the design of the battery. It explains that “Apple spent two to three thinner thicker cells, flattening of the overall structure of the battery.”
Besides this, Apple has patented a method for packing more active material in batteries, increasing durability without increasing the physical size. All this goes to show that Apple is investing so much attention in battery technology, as is the display or processor technology. Could we see the pattern continue in the IPAD 3 with a four-cell battery even more efficient?
Unique demands: As discussed previously, the common consensus among experts is that the IPAD 3 will be much better screen technology which will have a clearer and sharper screen. To put it bluntly, it will be a 9.7-inch screen Retina. This would suggest that any advantage gained by superior battery will lose pumping the extra pixels, but that’s not necessarily the case.
Display Technology DisplayMate site conducted a test that compares the iPhone 4 retinal display with low resolution screens of the Samsung S Galaxy Droid, the iPhone 3G and Google Nexus. It was found that 4 of the iPhone screen is the most energy efficient of the sample, “that supports Apple’s claims that the technology is easy on the battery.
The same can be said of Apple technology processor. There is a reasonable possibility of iPad 3 chipset (which they call the A6) will be quad-core, improve the skills of the bar significantly. This need not be a huge battery drain suggesting however. As mentioned before, on 2 dual-core A5 IPAD manages its energy much more efficiently than single-core A4 of the original IPAD, intelligent adjust its clock speed (and therefore energy use) in accordance with application.
How long will it last: Based on the suggestions above and the precedent set by previous devices from Apple, I guess the IPAD 3 of battery will see only modest gains as Apple seeks to create a tablet device more powerful and even thinner. Apple has always been the balance, and seems happy with the IPAD and October 2 hours of battery life – to be happy if you can keep that number in the face of significant improvements elsewhere.
According to CultofMac the iPad 3 will be the true technological leap forward for Apple’s tablet range. Perhaps the most impressive feat is that all this functionality does not come at the expense of battery life. Anyway, would not surprise me if the technology is increasingly efficient for Apple squeezed an extra hour of battery life out of IPAD 3. Put us down for 11.
0 comments:
Post a Comment